Did
you see it? Did you see the Blood Moon on the morning of April 4, 2015? I did
and I have the photos to prove it.
I'll
be very honest, these photos are definitely not "National Geographic"
or "Scientific American" quality. First, I don't have the kind of
sophisticated photographic equipment for this kind of photography. Second, the
idea of capturing these photos was on the spur of the moment. I was
experimenting in the dark of night. And, third, I take photos to document my
experiences not to emulate the "National Geographic" or
"Scientific American" pros.
A
Blood Moon is caused by a total lunar eclipse. This particular Blood Moon was
the third in a series of four within 18 months. This series of four eclipses,
six months apart, is called a tetrad. There will be a total of eight tetrads
between 2000 and 2100. This is the second tetrad of the century. The moon will
typically look orange or red and is caused by the rays of sunlight bending
around the Earth, which is between the sun and the moon. The color is caused as
the sunlight bends through the Earth's atmosphere.
I
took these photos from about 5,000 feet above sea level from my camping
location in Tonto National Park near Payson, Arizona. The sky was remarkably
clear. The first photo of the full, bright moon was taken in the eastern sky at
about 9 PM on Friday night, April 3rd. The Blood Moon, lunar eclipse, photo was
taken in the southern sky through a hole in the pine trees at about 5 AM April
4th when the eclipse was just about at it's fullest. It was about 40 degrees at
5 AM. I watched and shot photos for about 40 minutes.
The
bright, full moon was easier to photograph because there was lots of light. It
was almost bright enough to read comfortably. The Blood Moon was much harder to
photograph because it was much darker than the bright full moon. Remember, the
Blood Moon had no direct sunlight reflecting from it. It was totally in the
shadow of the Earth and the only light reflecting from it was coming around the
edges of the Earth through the atmosphere.
The
camera (and I experimented with both of my digital cameras) was tripod mounted
for stability. Obviously, I needed a wide lens opening and it required a time
exposure to capture enough light to provide a credible image. I could use a
remote shutter release via bluetooth from my smart phone with one of my
cameras. Unfortunately, I couldn't get a credible image from that camera.
I
don't have a way to remotely the shutter with the camera I used, so I had to
actually have my hands on the camera to hold the shutter release down. Thus,
it's apparent there was some slight, but evident movement of the camera during
the exposure, especially on Blood Moon photo. I used Photoshop to sharpen the
Blood Moon image a little before too much pixelization was apparent. But, then
again, as stated earlier, this is documentation of an experience and not for
publication in a major magazine.
No comments:
Post a Comment